Petition of M/s. Maharashtra Rajya Veej Grahak Sanghatna for review of Order dated 17.05.2007 in Case No. 82 of 2006.
Petition of M/s The Tata Power Company Ltd assailing the legality and propriety of letters dated 16th May 2010, 18th May 2010 and 12th June 2010 and of the letter dated 30th June 2010 issued by the Respondent No.1- Maharashtra State Load Dispatch Centre, thereby refusing to schedule 160 MW and 100 MW power respectively.
Petition of Smt. Juhi Vikas Vartak, of Virar (W) registered with Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Kalyan Zone, Kalyan about flying squad recovery.
Petition of Wardha Power Company Ltd for quashing of letter dated 30.03.2010 issued by the Maharashtra State Transmission Company Ltd., demanding transmission charges.
Petition of Wardha Power Company Ltd for grant of transmission capacity rights for evacuation of 270 MW (second phase) at the existing 220 Kv Warora Substation of power from the Petitioners generating station at Warora.
Petition of M/s Ramsons Castings P. Ltd for non-compliance of the Ombudsman Order dated 12.11.2007.
Petition of M/s Yash Agro Energy Ltd for adjudication of the claim arising out of denial of Open Access referred by a generating company directly connected to the distribution system of the Distribution Licensee.
Petition of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd for Clarification for determination of additional cost as reliability charges for withdrawal of load shedding in the Thane II urban region including Kalwa Sub-Division.
Petition filed by Shri Bhagwan Bhawarlal Dayma for Non-compliance of order dated 5.3.2009 passed by the CGRF Aurangabad.
Petition of Tata Power Co Ltd. for connectivity of 3 MW Solar based power generation project to the grid.
Petition of M/s Jain Irrigation Systems Limited seeking review of the Commission's Order dated 17.08.2009 passed in Case No. 116 of 2008.
Petition of Shri Nathu G Rambhad for directions to the Respondent to declare the repaired - failed transformers of which the colour of windings is blackened / Charred as failure due to overloads and hence outside the purview of guarantee-period clauses of the Order.