|
Orders for the Year 2012
|
| View |
Case No. |
Description
(In the matter of) |
Date |
|
|
|
IN THE MATTER OF
The Tata Power Company Limited- Distribution Business' (TPC-D) Petition for Truing Up for FY 2009-10 and Annual Performance Review for FY 2010-11
|
|
|
|
|
IN THE MATTER OF
The Tata Power Company Limited- Generation Business' (TPC-G) Petition for Truing Up for FY 2009-10 and Annual Performance Review for FY 2010-11
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Petition of MSEDCL for recovery of expenditure to be incurred for shifting of poles & conversion of low tension / high tension overhead distribution network to underground from consumers situated within the geographical limits of Nagpur Municipal Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
IN THE MATTER OF
Petition filed by The Tata Power Company Ltd.'s Transmission Business’ (TPC-T), for approval of truing up of Aggregate Revenue Requirement for FY 2009-10 and Annual Performance Review for FY 2010-11
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Complaint filed by Shri Sakharam Ganpatrao Deshpande against MSEDCL under
Section 142 of the Electricity Act, 2003, alleging non-compliance of the Order dated 4th
November, 2010 passed by the CGRF, Aurangabad Zone, in regard to meter reading
and revision of electricity bill.
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Petition of The Tata Power Co. Ltd. seeking redressal under section 86(1)(e) of the Electricity Act , 2003 seeking clarification and appropriate remedies for issues relating to wind power evacuation.
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Petition of BEST undertaking of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
seeking permission to recover FAC for the period from April, 2011 to October, 2011 incurred by BEST in excess of 10% cap and to allow recovery of FAC levied by TPC.
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Complaint filed by Bajaj Finserv Ltd., alleging non-compliance of the Commission’s Orders by MSEDCL, on change of Third Party sale, erroneous recovery of short term transmission charges, stopping wheeling arrangement of third party sale and holding refund of erroneous wheeling charges forcibly recovered earlier.
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Review Petition of MSEDCL in respect of Order dated 12th September 2010 in Case No. 111 of 2009 for withdrawal of load factor incentive to consumers who exceeds contract demand (during off-peak hours i.e. 22.00 to 6.00) and pay meager penalty.
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Petition under Section 67(4) of the E.A, 2003, challenging the order dated 22/07/2011 issued by District Magistrate, Wardha and notice issued by Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd. (MSETCL) under Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 for erection of 400 kV Koradi-Wardha line issued under Indian Telegraph Act, 1885.
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Petition by Grahak Panchayat, Ratnagiri, seeking amendment to the “Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum & Electricity Ombudsman) Regulations, 2006”.
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Petition filed by Ixora Construction (P) Ltd., Mumbai for approval of Power quantum and Power purchase for Medium Term from FY 2013-14 to FY 2017-18.
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Petition filed by Shri. Vinodkumar Giridharilal Mittal seeking uniform tariff on all
consumers, at Rs 3/- per unit and single tax and other prayers.
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Complaint filed by Shri Ankush Sitaram Gaikwad, under Section 142 of the EA 2003 and Regulation 22 of MERC (CGRF and EO) Regulations, 2006, against MSEDCL alleging non-compliance of the Order dated 28.10.2010 passed by the CGRF, Kolhapur Zone.
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Complaint filed by M/s Prerna Stone Crusher, against MSEDCL, under Sections 142, 149 and 42(1) of the Electricity Act, 2003, alleging non-compliance of the Order dated 4th June, 2011, passed by the CGRF, Amravati Zone, in the matter of seeking refund of the infrastructure cost and excessive charges incurred by the complainant.
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Petition filed by M/s. Gamesa Wind Turbines Pvt. Ltd., seeking amendment of
Annual Mean Wind Power Density criteria for Wind Power Projects under Wind
Zone -1 category in accordance with Regulation 26 read with sub-regulations 26.1,
26.2 & 26.3 of MERC (Terms and Conditions for Determination of RE Tariff)
Regulations, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Complaint filed by Shri Anandrao Sidu Dabane, against MSEDCL, under Section 142,
of the EA, 2003 and Regulation 22 of the MERC(CGRF&EO)Regulations, 2006,
alleging the non-compliance of the Order dated 4.5.2011, passed by CGRF, Kolhapur
Zone, in the matter of refund of cost of infrastructure and excessive charges collected.
|
|
|
|
|
Petition of M/s. Vel Induction Heaters & others alleging that Reliance Energy and Tata
power company have contravened the provisions of Section 45(5) of the Electricity Act,
2003 by arbitrarily levying two part tariff and categorizing low
tension consumer in contravention of
Section 62(3) of EA 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Petition of Akot Taluka Grahak Panchayat under Section 129 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and under Regulation 22 of the Supply Code and Regulation 26 of the MERC (CGRF & EO) Regulations, 2006 seeking Order and practice directions for respondents in the interest of existing and new prospective electricity consumers.
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Complaint filed by Shri. Haribhau D. Khapre, Sangli alleging that terms and conditions for grant of new electricity connections are in violation of Act and Regulations.
|
|
|
|
|
In the matter of
Complaint filed by Shri. Dhan Ayurved Agro Agriculturals against MSEDCL, under Section 142 of the EA, 2003, alleging the non-compliance of the Order dated 4.5.2011, passed by the CGRF, Kolhapur Zone, in the matter of refund of cost of infrastructure and excessive charges collected.
|
|
